ORGANIC AGRICULTURE IN MANY ASPECTS OF RECALLS sects

Organic farming in many respects resembles the sect of eco-friendly products are much more expensive than usual, but they do not carry any additional benefit to health or the environment. We just sponsoring organic farming, which in many respects resembles a cult.

Passions around organic food.

Why are we willing to pay big bucks for organic vegetables, fruits, milk, meat, and without batting an eye, agree on the fact that the European Union generously subsidize organic farming? Consumer surveys in different countries show similar results: people are convinced that organic food is not harmful chemistry, first of all pesticides. In second place is the desire to buy more useful (ie, containing more vitamins and trace elements), and at the same time more delicious foods.

And third, by a considerable margin, are the arguments for environmental protection, for ecological agriculture, as it might seem judging by the name, is not harmful to nature.

On the advantages of eco-friendly power supply not only speak manufacturers and organizations that support them green, but also the media. TV cook like a mantra repeated thesis that the delicious and healthy meals can be prepared only with organic products. These statements are not getting denials, so that in the public mind eco has become synonymous with the useful.

As for skepticism is not space here to practically do not reach the public voices of experts in toxicology, nutrition, agriculture, chemistry, or environmentalists. It is a pity: because most of our ideas about organic products - are myths.

Natural vs. Artificial

Organic farming is based, essentially, on one key principle, which states that chemistry, a man-made (ie, artificial fertilizers and plant protection products) is harmful and bad by nature. Therefore ekozemledeltsy use natural fertilizers, plant extracts and tools that are considered traditional, such as sulfur, which is used in agriculture to control mites and fungal diseases for five thousand years. The problem is that the artificial division of the bad and good life chemistry is scientifically absurd.

As far as a substance may be harmful to man and depends on the nature and properties of the dose and not by its origin.

So is there a chemistry of organic food? Yes. First of all, we eat, is composed of the chemical elements and chemical compounds. A good illustration of this is the recently circling the picture on the internet with a list of the usual apple.

This dihydrogen monoxide (i.e., water), vegetable oils, sugars, starch, carotene, tocopherol (E306), riboflavin (E101), nicotinamide, biotin, folic pantothenic, palmitic, oleic, linoleic, ethanedioic and salicylic acid, ascorbic acid (E300), stearic acid (E570), gidroksibutandiovaya acid (E296), purines, sodium, potassium, manganese, iron, copper, zinc, phosphorus, colorants and antioxidants.

Second, although the ecological products contain fewer pesticides, it does not mean that producers of organic vegetables do not use crop protection chemicals. EU rules allow the use of 26 so-called environmental pesticides - this is referred to the traditional, compounds of plant origin. However, they are not always less toxic.

For example, until 2011, the European and American ekohozyaystvah were allowed to use rotenone - a substance derived from tropical plants, and is actively used as an insecticide. It had to be removed from the list when studies in rats showed that high doses of rotenone cause symptoms similar to Parkinson's disease.

Not so scary pesticides

Curiously, no one in the world (the Americans are going to start this year alone) does not follow the real volumes of natural pesticides that are used in ekozemledelii, or because of their concentration in the product. According to studies, Eurobarometer, 78% of Poles (and an average of 72% of Europeans) fear artificial pesticide residues on vegetables, fruits and grains. These sentiments are largely echo the situation 50-60-ies, when the fertilizers and insecticides used in agriculture massively and quite nonchalantly.

Fear of DDT, which, as mentioned, will bring the world to an ecological apocalypse, has created the phenomenon of himiofobii - an irrational fear of any kind of chemical substances created by man.

Are the fears of fifty years ago are still relevant? Since the days of DDT in many countries the situation was quite different. There are state and inter-state institutions that deal with conservation and control used in agriculture synthetic agents (producing their industry has also changed: it is now paying much more attention to the safety aspects of the environment).

Changed and our knowledge. In 2000, two scientists from the University of California, Professor Bruce Ames (Bruce Ames) and Lois Gold (Lois Gold), published a very important study. It implies that with the food a person eats 5-10 thousand species of pesticides to protect against pests produce plants themselves. Among all pesticides used by man of 99.99% are of natural origin.

And if synthetic pesticides are well understood, then a plant we know much less. About 100 kinds of natural pesticides have been tested on animals, and found that half of them have provoked the development of cancer.

Does this mean that the edible plants cause cancer? No, but the example shows the absurdity of our antihimicheskoy hysteria. By focusing attention on the part of man-made plant protection products, we are afraid of 0.01% contained pesticides in our food!

Meanwhile, 71% of synthetic pesticides used today in agriculture, less toxic than vanilla, while 97% - than caffeine or aspirin.

U.S. and EU spend in this area a thorough inspection. Recently, the European Agency for Food Safety (EFSA) has published a detailed report on pesticides in food products. Was examined 77,000 samples from 29 European countries, as a result of suspicion of experts called a pesticide concentration of 0.4 samples. However, according to experts EFSA, even eating these products would not constitute a health hazard.

Experts from University College Dublin, in turn, show that among people in the diet which most cereals, the use of synthetic pesticides is at the level of 0.1 to 10% of the safe dose of pesticides established by the World Health Organization (WHO).

Neither useful nor tastier

The assertion that the certified organic products guarantee our favor, is also incorrect. The relevant certificate shows only that something was grown in accordance with the principles of organic agriculture. Therefore, the U.S.

Department of Agriculture, is responsible for the introduction of a certification system in the country, accurately warns icon eco does not mean that the product will be more useful or qualitative.

Oasis at Bird-in-Hand features growing efforts of Plain Sect farmers

Описание:

It is horsepower food, produced by Plain Sect farmers with animals and without chemicals.

You can buy it by subscribing to a weekly service that will provide you with a share of the fresh, organic produce.

Or you can visit a newly opened retail store in Ronks, where seasonal produce, organic meats and cheeses are available.

By this spring, organizers hope a creamery will be churning out pasteurized milk, yogurt and other dairy products there, and possibly offering raw milk.

Oasis at Bird-in-Hand features the growing efforts of about 30 Plain Sect farmers, who raise everything from beef to beets.

"Our whole goal is to strengthen the ag heritage in the area," said Reuben Stoltzfus, of Bird-in-Hand, one of three principals in the project.

Read more: http://lancasteronline.com/article/lo...

Multivitamin supplements increase risk of death

Multivitamin supplements increase risk of death
Multivitamin supplements increase the risk of death, for scho zanadto, it is not reasonable.

October 10, 2011 researchers University of Minnesota found that death rates among women taking multivitamin supplements are higher than in those who did not. Two days later, researchers from the Cleveland Clinic found that men taking vitamin E, are at greater risk of cancer of the prostate. It was a tough week for vitamins, - said Carrie Gann (Carrie Gann) in the news on the TV channel ABC.

In the obtained results it was nothing new.

Seven of previous studies have shown that vitamins increase the risk of cancer and heart disease as well as reduce life expectancy. However, in 2012, more than half of all Americans take vitamin supplements. However, very few people aware of the fact that the origins of hobbies vitamins was the same person.

This man was so obviously right that he received the Nobel Prize, and so obviously wrong that it can probably be considered the world's largest charlatan. In 1931, Linus Pauling (Linus Pauling) published a paper in the Journal of the American Chemical Society entitled The Nature of chemical bonds» (The Nature of the Chemical Bond). Before this publication have been known to chemists are two types of chemical bonds: ionic, in which one atom gives its electron to another atom, and covalent when the atoms together hold electrons. Pauling argued that things are not so simple - the common possession of the electrons, in his opinion, should be placed somewhere between ionic and covalent bonds.

The idea of Pauling revolutionized this field, combining quantum physics with chemistry. His concept was in fact so revolutionary that the editor of the magazine, received the manuscript, he could not find anyone who could write a review on it. When Albert Einstein was asked what he thought about the work of Pauling, he shrugged and said, For me it was too difficult.

For one this article Pauling was awarded the Prize of the Langmuir (Langmuir Prize) as the most outstanding young chemists in the United States, he became the youngest member of the National Academy of Sciences, was promoted to full professor at the California Institute of Technology (Caltech) and, in addition, he was awarded the Nobel Prize in chemistry. Pauling at the time was 30 years.

In 1949, Pauling published in Science magazine article entitled sickle cell anemia, a molecular disease» (Sickle Cell Anemia, a Molecular Disease). While researchers have known that hemoglobin (the protein in blood transports oxygen) crystallizes in cells of humans suffering from sickle cell anemia, which causes pain in the joints, blood coagulation and death. But they do not understand why this is happening. Pauling first to show that sickle-hemoglobin has a slightly different electric charge, and it significantly affects the quality of how hemoglobin reacts with oxygen. Pauling gave rise to the opening of a scientific field called molecular biology.

In 1951, Pauling published an article in the book Memoirs of the National Academy of Sciences» (Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences), entitled Protein Structure» (The Structure of Proteins). Scientists have known that proteins are made up of groups of amino acids. Pauling suggested that proteins also have a secondary structure which is determined by the way they are superposed on each other.

One configuration he called alpha-helix» (alpha helix) - this was later used by James Watson (James Watson), Francis Crick (Francis Krick) to explain the structure of DNA. In 1961, Pauling took a blood sample from the gorillas, chimpanzees and other apes at the zoo in San Diego. He intended to find out whether you can use a mutation in hemoglobin as a kind of evolutionary clock.

Pauling showed that humans diverged from gorillas about 11 million years ago, that is, much earlier than expected at the time of the scientists. One of his colleagues later commented: In one fell swoop he combined disciplines such as paleontology, evolutionary biology and molecular biology.

Pauling's achievements were not limited to science. Beginning in the 1950s - and over the next 40 years - he was the most recognized activist for peace. Pauling protested the internment of Japanese Americans during World War II, rejected the suggestion of Robert Oppenheimer on the participation in the work on the implementation of the Manhattan Project, confronted Sen. Joseph McCarthy, refusing to utter the oath of loyalty, publicly argued with such hawks in the area of nuclear weapons as Edward Teller, forced the government to admit that nuclear explosions can damage human genes, persuaded other Nobel laureates speak out against the war in Vietnam, and also wrote a bestseller called No to war!» (No More War!). Pauling's efforts have led to the conclusion of the treaty banning nuclear weapons tests.

In 1962, he received the Nobel Peace Prize and became the first person to receive two Nobel Prizes are personal. In addition to his election to the National Academy of Sciences, the two Nobel Prizes, the National Medal of Science and Medal For Merit (this award has been awarded to him by President of the United States), Pauling received honorary degrees from the University of Cambridge, University of London, and the University of Paris. In 1961, his portrait appeared on the cover of the magazine Time «Man of the Year, it praised as the most outstanding scientist who ever lived on the planet.

But at some point all the thoroughness, hard work and a deep understanding of who made the Linus Pauling descriptions, were negated.

Vitamin Supplements Linked With Higher Death Risk in Women, Study Finds

Описание:

Vitamin Supplements Linked With Higher Death Risk in Women http://patkochfiles.info/files/vitami... vitamin supplements for women vitamin supplements for men vitamin supplements bad for you vitamin supplements for weight loss vitamin supplements for acne vitamins and supplements multivitamin vitamin d supplements best vitamin supplements are vitamin supplements beneficial benefits of vitamin supplements herbal supplements dietary supplements super supplements multivitamin supplements calcium supplements fish oil one a day omega 3 vitamin supplements linked to increased risk for death dr oz vitamin supplements liquid vitamin supplements discount vitamin supplements